Every meeting, independently verified.
Seven public criteria. Before the meeting, the prospect confirms it directly to us, not to the agency or the buyer. Anything still disputed is ruled on by a body paid the same either way.
7 public criteria 30 seconds for the prospect 3 business days to contest
The buyer who commissioned this ruling lost it.
- Objection
- Criterion 7, Novelty. The buyer said the account was already theirs.
- Evidence
- No CRM record was produced. The account was not on the suppression list the buyer supplied.
- Rule R2
- Whoever objects must prove the objection. The criterion passes.
Specimen ruling, illustrative only. Read the full ruling
Three published rulings, including one the paying client lost.
Each one sets out the full reasoning for every criterion.
Not qualified
The agency loses on one fact: 14 employees, against an agreed ICP minimum of 50.
Proves: “close enough” is not a finding. An ICP must be met in full.
Open the ruling MV-2026-0044Qualified
The buyer said the account was already in its pipeline but produced no record. The agency keeps the fee.
Proves: the Standard can rule against whoever pays.
Open the ruling MV-2026-0057Qualified · held over
An approach framed as research, with an invitation that named the vendor. Held a week for a second sitting.
Proves: the method holds on a hard call, and the buyer’s disagreement is printed on the ruling.
Open the rulingPaying per meeting leads to arguments about which meetings count.
Nobody defines “qualified”
B2B outbound contracts rest on the phrase a qualified meeting, yet almost none define it. So the argument starts when the invoice arrives.
Each side judges its own case
The buyer decides whether to pay and the agency decides whether to argue. Each referees a match it has a stake in.
Good agencies lose out too
Buyers cannot tell careful setters from careless ones, so they price every agency as careless. Good work goes unproven and unpaid.
A qualified meeting passes all seven checks.
There is no partial credit. A pass or fail gets the same answer whoever judges it. A grade does not.
QUALIFIED
The agency’s Millesimal Rating: cleared meetings per thousand submitted.
Standard v1.0 · criterion 1
The prospect confirms the meeting to us before it happens.
Today, the evidence comes from people with money at stake. With a Meeting Receipt, the agency adds one line to its calendar invite. The prospect spends thirty seconds confirming their role, who they are meeting, and that it is a sales call.
- Prospect confirms
- Role · Awareness · Consent · Attendance
- Checked on record
- Fit, against the ICP locked before outreach · Novelty, against the suppression list
- Still arguable
- Need, the only criterion that rests on the vendor’s notes
If the prospect does not answer, the meeting goes ahead and nothing counts against anyone. The prospect gets a copy, so a false Receipt is caught by the one person who would know.
Receipted before the call. Nobody had to argue.
- 1 Role
- Prospect stated · checked externally
- 2 Fit
- Checked against the locked ICP
- 3 Awareness
- Prospect confirmed
- 4 Need
- Vendor stated
- 5 Consent
- Prospect confirmed
- 6 Attendance
- Prospect confirmed afterwards
- 7 Novelty
- Checked against the suppression list
Specimen receipt, illustrative only. Free to the buyer.
Before silver can be sold in Britain, an independent Assay Office tests it and stamps its purity out of a thousand. Buyers trust the stamp over the seller.
An agency rated 870 clears 870 of every 1,000 meetings it submits.
It is a count, so nobody has to agree what “good” means. Hallmarking has worked this way for seven centuries. Outbound sales has never had it.
Expect a rating to sit below an agency’s show rate, because attendance is only one of seven checks.
Five steps to one written ruling, in two business days.
You send the meeting
Send the disputed meeting, the criterion you object under, and the written record you already have. No new paperwork.
We tell you who is deciding
Before any evidence is sent, both sides learn who the adjudicator is and what else they do. Either side can refuse them, free and without giving a reason.
Both sides file
The agency sends evidence for the meeting. The buyer sends evidence for the objection, under a named criterion. We never accept call recordings or transcripts.
Each check is decided alone
Its reasoning is written before the next check is read and before the result is known. Borderline calls wait a week for a second sitting.
Both sides get the ruling at once
It gives the reasoning for each criterion and what would have changed the answer. Either side has fourteen days to reply on the record. There is no private version.
Every ruling is kept.
Rulings are never edited. A material error gets a new ruling that names the original, and both stay on the record. Replies are kept with the ruling.
- Window
- Three business days to contest. Silence clears the meeting.
- Burden
- Whoever objects must prove it. “It felt weak” is not an objection.
- Version
- Each ruling applies the Standard in force on the day of the meeting.
What keeps Millesimal independent
Each commitment blocks one way Millesimal could be bought. Hold us to them.
One adjudicator, named to you before you submit anything.
Millesimal is currently one adjudicator, which is a real weakness. Either side can refuse them without giving a reason. Once volume allows, a second reader will check each ruling before issue, and we will announce it here.
Read the full positionNote on 07. If we published ratings without consent, no agency would send us meetings. That choice has a real downside, and we say so.
Use the Standard in your contracts for free.
Agreeing any definition before outreach matters more than which one. Put this clause in your contract and most disputes stop, whether or not you ever pay us.
No permission, credit or licence needed. If a criterion does not work in your market, tell us. That is how version 1.1 gets written.
A starting draft, not legal advice. Ask your solicitor to review it.
Start with the meetings you already have.
Send the meeting you cannot agree on, and judge the ruling by its reasoning.
Stop paying for meetings that did not count
One document in two business days that you can show the agency.
- How the fee works, and turnaround
- What evidence you already have
- What to do when the agency ignores a ruling
Run a founding Diagnostic
Send twenty of last month’s meetings. A private report shows which criteria they would fail and which evidence gaps cost you disputes.
- No charge for the first two agencies
- Written notes only, never recordings
- Private. Nothing is published
Join the v1.1 review panel
Named, credited and free to disagree in public. Arguments that change the Standard are published with it.
- Disagreement is the point
- Credited on the published Standard
- No cost, no commitment to adopt
Send one meeting, or ask one question.
Both get a real answer. If the evidence cannot support a ruling, we will say so instead of taking the fee.
- Fee
- Flat, per meeting. Paid the same either way.
- Agreed
- Before either side files any evidence.
- Turnaround
- Two business days after both sides have filed.
- Intake
- Capped. We refuse work rather than rush it.
Prefer email? hello@millesimal.uk
A person will reply. If you sent a meeting, you will next get the adjudicator’s name, before any evidence.