For buyers

Stop paying for meetings that did not count.

A ruling in two business days, in one document you can show the agency. No more arguing over what qualified means.

Flat fee, whatever the ruling No evidence sent through this site We say if a meeting cannot be ruled on
How the fee works

A flat fee, agreed before any evidence is filed.

You pay the same whichever way the ruling goes, and whoever is asking. It is the first of our eight published commitments.

We set it below what is at stake: the fee you already paid, plus your AE’s time if the meeting was wrongly accepted.

What is fixed and what varies
Fixed
A flat fee per meeting, quoted before you send anything.
Fixed
No commission, no referral fee and no share of any money returned to you.
Fixed
A ruling within two business days of both sides filing.
Fixed
Capped intake. We turn work away rather than rush it.
Varies
Volume. A batch costs less per meeting than a single dispute.
Varies
Speed. A ruling on the same day costs extra, if we have capacity.

We confirm the fee in writing when you enquire. Nothing is invoiced until the adjudication agreement is signed.

Published rates will return once there are enough real rulings to price against.
What you send

You already have everything we need.

No new paperwork. If a meeting cannot be ruled on from what exists, we say so and take no fee. Agencies that use Millesimal give you a free certificate on every receipted meeting.

Never accepted: call recordings or transcripts, which the prospect never agreed to have judged. We rule on the agreed written record.
Typical bundle
Criterion
The named criterion you object under. “It felt weak” is not enough.
ICP
The profile agreed in writing when the campaign started.
Suppression
The list you supplied before outreach began.
Invitation
The invitation the attendee accepted, and the outreach before it.
Report
The agency’s meeting report, and your AE’s note if there is one.
CRM
Any record of earlier contact, if you say the prospect was not new.

Filed under the adjudication agreement, never through this site.

Hard questions

What buyers ask before they start.

“Will the agency just ignore the ruling?”

Some will, the first time. But then they must answer a reasoned ruling in writing, on a record neither side can edit. The bigger gain is the clause in your next contract.

“Is this binding?”

Only if you both choose it. By default it is advisory. A binding ruling is required when a fee is held in escrow.

“What if we are the ones who are wrong?”

Then the ruling says so, before it harms the relationship. In one of our three published specimens, the buyer lost and the fee stood.

“Who decides?”

Before you send evidence, we tell you who the adjudicator is and what else they do. You can refuse them at no cost and without a reason. This is shared with the parties, not published.

“Can this be used against us later?”

Rulings stay private to the two parties. A rating is published only with the agency’s written consent. Anonymised totals may be published, and never identify a buyer.

“What about the prospect’s data?”

We keep as little as possible. Prospect emails are hashed on receipt, never stored in plain text. Name and job title are kept only where criterion 1 needs them. Evidence is deleted after 24 months.

What do we get from an adjudication?

Seven decisions on one meeting, each with its evidence. Each failed criterion comes with the reasoning and what would have changed it. Both sides receive the document at once, with fourteen days to reply on the record.

You get no opinion on the meeting’s quality, either side’s conduct or your agency.

How long does it take?

Two business days from when both sides have filed. A ruling on the same day costs extra, and only if we have capacity.

A borderline criterion may go to a second sitting a week later. Hard calls are not rushed.

Do we need our agency to agree to this?

Yes. Both sides sign the adjudication agreement for a binding ruling. If the agency will not take part, you can still ask for an advisory ruling. It says on its face that only one side took part, it is not binding, and the agency is invited to reply on the record.

Easier still, use the contract clause. Agree the definition and referral route before outreach starts.

What if a meeting is ruled not qualified?

You get that meeting’s fee back, on the terms agreed with the agency. The agency’s submitted count rises by one and its cleared count does not. That is how a rating moves.

In Phase 1, Millesimal does not handle that money. You and the agency settle it.

Is this arbitration?

No. It is an expert determination on the evidence supplied, not a legal ruling on your contract. Liability is capped at the adjudication fee. The law of England and Wales applies.

Send us the meeting you are disputing.

Judge us on the reasoning in a ruling, not on a website.